Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380022›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2025

Assessment of the Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Biologic Drugs: mAb Product Quality and Risk Evaluation for Global Shipping Logistics.

Nathalie Fuentes, Arjun Suri, Annette M Medina, Alain Moffett, Aakash Patel, Stanley C Kwok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathalie FuentesDosage Form Design and Development, BioPharmaceutical Development, R&D, AstraZeneca, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA. nathalie.fuentes@astrazeneca.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2075-4219
Arjun SuriEurofins Lancaster Laboratories PSS Insourcing Solutions, 2430 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA, 17601, USA.
Annette M MedinaDosage Form Design and Development, BioPharmaceutical Development, R&D, AstraZeneca, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Alain MoffettEurofins Lancaster Laboratories PSS Insourcing Solutions, 2430 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA, 17601, USA.
Aakash PatelAnalytical Sciences, BioPharmaceutical Development, R&D, AstraZeneca, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Stanley C KwokDosage Form Design and Development, BioPharmaceutical Development, R&D, AstraZeneca, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is critical to ensure that drug product quality is not negatively impacted after transportation and shipping so that the product remains safe and effective. The traditional shipping validation and product quality assessments focus on factors such as temperature, vibration, shock, agitation, light exposure, and potential contamination. At the same time, due to the complexity of biologics modalities including cell therapy products, the increasing prevalence of non-intrusive inspection (NII) technologies employing ionizing radiation such as X-ray and Gamma rays at security screening at border points has prompted an evaluation of their impact on biologics.

methodsIn this study, the effect of X-ray radiation on monoclonal antibody (mAb)-related biologic drug substance and drug products was investigated by subjecting them to worst-case scenario radiation levels, approximately 200 times higher than the recommended dose, within commonly deployed shipping packaging and primary container. Subsequently, product quality attributes, including visible particles, sub-visible particles, purity, and charge variants, were assessed.

resultsThe results revealed no significant changes in the exposed samples compared to controls, indicating that the mAb-related biologics maintained their product quality despite exposure to heightened X-ray radiation.

conclusionsThese findings provide valuable assurance regarding the stability and safety of mAb-related biologics when subjected to X-ray radiation during transportation and security screenings. Our goal is that this work will stimulate further discussion and guidance from drug sponsors and health authorities to evaluate ionizing radiation impact on current biologics and others new modalities to ensure drug and patient safety.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiological ProductsRadiation, IonizingDrug ContaminationDrug PackagingDrug StabilityHumansQuality ControlRisk AssessmentTransportationX-RaysAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological Productsbiologicsdrug stabilitydrug transportproduct qualityX-ray radiation

Identifiers

PMID40380022
PMCPMC12222358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.