ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Effects of Interphase and Interpulse Delays on Tissue Impedance and Pulsed Field Ablation.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Controlling pulsed field ablation efficacy during ablation procedures.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Endoluminal Catheter Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Evaluation of variable inter-pulse delay and timing on pulsed field ablation lesion characteristics.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Mitigating muscle contractions during pulsed field ablation by utilizing intersegment delays.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Power-Driven Electroporation Is Predictive of Treatment Outcomes in a Conductivity-Independent Manner.BME frontiers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHigh-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) is a pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique that employs a series of high-voltage, microseconds-long positive and negative pulses, separated by interphase (d1) and interpulse (d2) delays to non-thermally ablate tissue. Previous experimental and computational data suggest an impact of delays on nerve excitation and electrochemical effects. However, the impact of delays on PFA outcomes, such as change in resistance and ablation generation, has only recently started to be elucidated.
methodsWhile recording the applied voltage and currents, we delivered a series of increasing voltages, termed voltage ramps, into tuber and cardiac tissues using both needle electrode pairs and flat plate electrodes. Tissues were stained for metabolic activity to measure irreversible electroporation areas following treatment.
resultsOur findings support previous in vitro data that delays do not significantly affect ablation areas. While there were significant differences in applied current, resistance, and conductivity between different pulse widths at sub-electroporation electric fields, we found no significant differences after inducing electroporation between different delays and pulse widths. Consequently, since delays do not affect ablation areas or local conductivity, the data suggests that delays should not affect the electric field threshold or Joule heating within the tissue.
conclusionThe findings presented here provide critical insights into electroporation-dependent tissue conductivity changes from H-FIRE with implications for improving H-FIRE parameterization and computational models for treatment planning in cancer and cardiac pulsed field ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.