Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379988›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Diagnostic utility of electrophysiological markers for early and differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's, Frontotemporal, and Lewy Body dementias: A systematic review.

Stéphanie De Keulenaer, Sara Van Mossevelde, Tobi Van den Bossche, David Crosiers, Patrick Cras, Tommas Ellender, Rose Bruffaerts

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stéphanie De KeulenaerUniversity of Antwerp (Uantwerpen), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Sara Van MosseveldeUniversity of Antwerp (Uantwerpen), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Tobi Van den BosscheUniversity of Antwerp (Uantwerpen), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
David CrosiersUniversity of Antwerp (Uantwerpen), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Patrick CrasUniversity of Antwerp (Uantwerpen), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Tommas EllenderUniversity of Antwerp (Uantwerpen), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Rose BruffaertsUniversity of Antwerp (Uantwerpen), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. rose.bruffaerts@uantwerpen.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-9234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to provide optimal patient care in neurodegenerative diseases. Although an EEG shows advantages in availability and cost compared to the current diagnostic tools, it is not routinely used in clinical practice. Previous reviews have either focused on single disease populations and/or solely on resting-state EEG. To evaluate the utility of EEG for early diagnosis and differential diagnosis, we conducted a systematic review across Alzheimer's disease (AD), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) and Lewy Body Dementia (DLB).

methodsWe searched databases Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles published from 2000 to 2023 investigating resting-state and task-based EEG-markers in biomarker-proven AD, FTD and DLB.

resultsOur search yielded a total of 12010 studies, of which 70 papers were eligible: 34 on AD, 18 on DLB, 9 on FTD, and 9 studies combining disease populations. Slowing of the frequency spectrum was a common observation across diseases, achieving excellent sensitivity in AD and DLB. Research on FTD was limited and with varying results in the discrimination from healthy controls, although connectivity analysis and microstates are promising avenues. In differential diagnosis, both spectral and connectivity metrics show encouraging results. Task-based EEG emerges as a promising tool in early AD.

conclusionEEG shows promise as a cost-effective, non-invasive tool for early detection and differential diagnosis. Future research should aim to collect standardized data from multicentric cohorts, across multiple diseases and stages, and explore the neural underpinnings of these diseases, to improve interpretability of the findings.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseElectroencephalographyFrontotemporal DementiaLewy Body DiseaseBiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly DiagnosisHumansBiomarkersAlzheimer's diseaseDiagnostic accuracyEEGFrontotemporal dementiaLewy body dementiaNeurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.