ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Facilitators and Barriers for a Stepped Care Approach to Promote Return to Work of Employees with Distress: A Multi-perspective Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predictors of Patient Engagement in a Care Coordination Program.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA stepped care approach, beginning with a low-intensity e-Health program followed by a high-intensity Participatory Approach led by a return-to-work (RTW) coordinator is a promising intervention to promote RTW of employees on sick leave with distress. As this approach is new, determinants of its successful implementation remain unknown. This study aimed to identify the potential facilitators and barriers for a stepped care approach to promote RTW of employees with distress, from the perspective of employees, employers, and occupational physicians.
methodsA qualitative study was performed consisting of individual semi-structured interviews with 10 employees, 5 supervisors, and two focus groups with 15 occupational physicians. The verbatim transcripts were inductively thematically coded. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied to classify themes within its domains.
resultsThemes were constructed belonging to either the implementation or the content of the stepped care approach, falling within the CFIR domains "innovation," "outer setting," "inner setting," and "characteristics of the individual." From all three stakeholder groups, identified facilitators were the tailored program, enabling task adjustments, and the RTW coordinator to stimulate a good communicative relationship between employee and supervisor. Barriers identified were the timing of the stepped care approach, integrating the approach in the current RTW system, and low digital skills.
conclusionBoth facilitators and barriers were found for the implementation of the stepped care approach. This underlines the importance of an adaptive implementation strategy that takes into account workplace dynamics and tailored approaches to support the stakeholder groups' needs.
trial registrationISRCTN: 90663076. Registered on October 5, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.