ArticleScientific reports2025
Arthroscopic bone grafting for Schatzker III tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective comparative study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopically assisted treatment versus traditional open reduction for Schatzker type III posterolateral tibial plateau collapse fractures. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 40 patients with Schatzker type III fractures (lateral plateau collapse) treated at our hospital between October 2020 and March 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: the arthroscopy group (n = 19) and the open incision group (n = 21). General patient information, hospitalization costs, length of stay, and wound length were collected. All patients were followed for one year postoperatively, with knee function assessed using the Lysholm score. Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-square test, and continuous variables using independent sample t-tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The arthroscopy group had significantly shorter operation times and postoperative hospital stays compared to the open incision group (p < 0.05). Additionally, surgical costs were significantly lower in the arthroscopy group (p < 0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, the arthroscopy group demonstrated significantly higher Lysholm scores compared to the open incision group. However, there was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the two groups at the 6 months and 1-year follow-up (p > 0.05). Compared to traditional open reduction and internal fixation, arthroscopic treatment of Schatzker type III posterolateral tibial plateau collapse fractures offers several advantages, including shorter operative time, lower cost, fewer incision-related complications, no need for secondary removal of internal fixation, faster postoperative functional recovery, and minimally invasive, cosmetically favorable incisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.