ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Methods for Automatic Detection of White Blood Cells in Images.
Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GHMS-CycleGAN: Graph-Based Hierarchical Multi-stain CycleGAN for Stain Normalization and Classification in Digital Pathology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data scieQuerynce (DS) methods and artificial intelligence (AI) are critical in today's healthcare services operations. This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of AI and DS in biomedical diagnostics, including automatic detection and counting of white blood cells (WBCs) and types, which provide valuable information for diagnosing and treating blood diseases such as leukemia. Automating these tasks using AI and DS saves time and avoids or minimizes errors compared to manual processes, which can be complex and error prone. The study utilizes bibliographic data from SCOPUS to evaluate research on applying AI algorithms and DS methods for mapping and classifying WBC images for treatment of blood diseases, such as leukemia using literature survey and science mapping methodology. The results show the potency of different DS methods and AI algorithms, such as machine learning, deep learning, and classification algorithms that enable the automatic detection of WBC images. AI and DS algorithms offer critical benefits in effectively and efficiently analyzing microscopic images of blood cells. The automatic identification, localization, and classification of WBCs speed up the patient diagnosis process, allowing hematologists to focus on interpreting results. Automatic processes identify specific abnormalities and patterns, enhancing accuracy and timely diagnoses. Future work will examine the application of generative AI in blood cells diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.