ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Self-reported mental health in school-aged children using the Dominic Interactive questionnaire in the French Enabee 2022 study.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enabee 2022 is a national cross-sectional study conducted in 399 French schools to assess children's mental health by incorporating their own perceptions of it. Specifically, we used the Dominic Interactive (DI), which consists of illustrated questions reflecting situations associated with symptoms of common disorders. We collected DI responses from 15,206 children (48.9% girls, with a mean age of 8.91 years and a standard deviation of 0.04) attending schools in metropolitan France. This large sample provided a unique opportunity to deepen our understanding of the psychometric properties of the DI and to assess the self-reported prevalence of mental health problems in children. To generate national estimates of children's mental health, we employed a probabilistic multistage, stratified, and balanced sampling design. Statistical analyses accounted for the study's sampling design, including nonresponse weight adjustments, strata, and the finite population correction factor. The Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega values were acceptable (between 0.56 and 0.91) for all DI subscales assessing specific mental health disorders, and metric measurement invariance was observed across gender, school type, and grade levels. Based on the DI cut-off, we estimated that 28.7% of children reported at least one probable mental health disorder. Phobias and separation anxiety disorder were the most common probable disorders (9.4% and 10.7%, respectively). Integrating the DI allows for the consideration of children's own perspectives when assessing their mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.