ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel framework for sentiment classification employing Bi-GRU optimized by enhanced human evolutionary optimization algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tri-MCA fusion: cross-modal attention and dynamic gating for multimodal sentiment analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentiment analysis of content is highly essential for myriad natural language processing tasks. Particularly, as the movies are often created on the basis of public opinions, reviews of people have gained much attention, and analyzing sentiments has also become a crucial and demanding task. The unique characteristics of this data, such as the length of text, spelling mistakes, and abbreviations, necessitate a non-conventional method and additional stages for sentiment analysis in such an environment. To do so, this paper conducted two different word embedding models, namely GloVe and Word2Vec, for vectorization. In this study, Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit was employed, since there were two polarities, including positive and negative. Then, it was optimized by the Enhanced Human Evolutionary Optimization (EHEO) algorithm, hence improving the hyperparameters. The findings showed that using GloVe, the Bi-GRU/EHEO model achieved 97.26% for precision, 96.37% for recall, 97.42% for accuracy, and 96.30% for F1-score. With Word2Vec, the suggested model attained 98.54% for precision, 97.75% for recall, 97.54% for accuracy, and 97.63% for F1-score. These model were compared with other models like GRU that accomplished the precision, recall, accuracy, and F1-score values of 89.24, 90.14, 89.57, and 89.68 for Glove as well the values of 89.67, 90.18, 90.75, and 89.41 for Word2Vec; and Bi-GRU that accomplished the values of 90.13, 90.47, 90.71, and 90.30 for Glove, as well as the values of 90.31, 90.76, 90.67, and 90.53 for Word2Vec. The suggested sentiment analysis approaches demonstrated much potential to be used in real-world applications, like customer feedback evaluation, political opinion analysis, and social media sentiment analysis. By using these models' high efficiency and accuracy, the approaches could have offered some practical solutions for diverse industries to forecast trends, enhance decision-making procedures, and examine textual data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.