Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379799›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel framework for sentiment classification employing Bi-GRU optimized by enhanced human evolutionary optimization algorithm.

Xi Wang, Samad Nourmohammadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xi WangYunnan Agricultural University, Puer, Yunnan, 665099, PR China.
Samad NourmohammadiIslamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. samadnourmohammadi@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment analysis of content is highly essential for myriad natural language processing tasks. Particularly, as the movies are often created on the basis of public opinions, reviews of people have gained much attention, and analyzing sentiments has also become a crucial and demanding task. The unique characteristics of this data, such as the length of text, spelling mistakes, and abbreviations, necessitate a non-conventional method and additional stages for sentiment analysis in such an environment. To do so, this paper conducted two different word embedding models, namely GloVe and Word2Vec, for vectorization. In this study, Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit was employed, since there were two polarities, including positive and negative. Then, it was optimized by the Enhanced Human Evolutionary Optimization (EHEO) algorithm, hence improving the hyperparameters. The findings showed that using GloVe, the Bi-GRU/EHEO model achieved 97.26% for precision, 96.37% for recall, 97.42% for accuracy, and 96.30% for F1-score. With Word2Vec, the suggested model attained 98.54% for precision, 97.75% for recall, 97.54% for accuracy, and 97.63% for F1-score. These model were compared with other models like GRU that accomplished the precision, recall, accuracy, and F1-score values of 89.24, 90.14, 89.57, and 89.68 for Glove as well the values of 89.67, 90.18, 90.75, and 89.41 for Word2Vec; and Bi-GRU that accomplished the values of 90.13, 90.47, 90.71, and 90.30 for Glove, as well as the values of 90.31, 90.76, 90.67, and 90.53 for Word2Vec. The suggested sentiment analysis approaches demonstrated much potential to be used in real-world applications, like customer feedback evaluation, political opinion analysis, and social media sentiment analysis. By using these models' high efficiency and accuracy, the approaches could have offered some practical solutions for diverse industries to forecast trends, enhance decision-making procedures, and examine textual data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNatural Language ProcessingHumansBidirectional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU)Enhanced human evolutionary optimization (EHEO)GloVeSentiment analysisWord2 VecWord embedding

Identifiers

PMID40379799
PMCPMC12084360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.