ArticleScientific reports2025
Simulating metabolic pathways to enhance interpretations of metabolome genome-wide association studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding cardiac metabolic reprogramming through single-cell multi-omics: from mechanisms to therapeutic applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in large-scale analysis of metabolites in human peripheral blood samples revealed the links between metabolite concentrations and genetic variations. This field is known as metabolome-genome-wide association study (MGWAS). Although MGWAS is a powerful tool, it has some limitations, particularly in terms of the number of metabolites that can be measured. Whether the observed associations are directly due to genetic variation or indirectly due to changes in unmeasured metabolites is unclear. To address this, we used simulations of metabolic pathway models to investigate the influence of genetic variants on metabolite concentrations and enhance the interpretation of MGWAS results. By systematically adjusting the enzyme reaction rates to simulate genetic variants, we observed changes in the metabolite levels. Our simulations accurately represented most of the variant-metabolite pairs identified by MGWAS with significant p-values, thereby demonstrating the potential of our approach. Furthermore, our simulations revealed additional marked fluctuations in metabolite levels that the MGWAS did not detect, suggesting that some variant-metabolite pairs might become more significant with larger sample sizes. We also categorized the enzymes into three types based on their impact on metabolite concentrations, highlighting enzymes with minimal impact. This indicated that genetic variations in these enzymes may have limited biological significance. Our study not only validates key MGWAS findings, but also provides a systematic framework for understanding enzyme-metabolite relationships. This approach offers valuable insights for future experimental studies and potential therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.