ArticleScientific reports2025
LLM-based robot personality simulation and cognitive system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inherence of personality in human-robot interaction enhances conversational dynamics and user experience. The deployment of Chat GPT-4 within a cognitive robot framework is designed by using state-space realization to emulate specific personality traits, incorporating elements of emotion, motivation, visual attention, and both short-term and long-term memory. The encoding and retrieval of long-term memory are facilitated through document embedding techniques, while emotions are generated based on predictions of future events. This framework processes textual and visual information, responding or initiating actions in accordance with the configured personality settings and cognitive processes. The constancy and effectiveness of the personality simulation have been compared to human baseline and validated via two personality assessments: the International Personality Item Pool - Neuroticism, Extraversion and Openness (IPIP-NEO) and the Big Five personality test. Our proposed personality model of cognitive robot is designed by using Kelly's role construct repertory, Cattell's 16 personality factors and preferences, which are analyzed by construct validity and compared to human subjects. Theory of mind is observed in personality simulation, which perform better second-order of belief compared to other agent on the improved theory of mind dataset (ToMi dataset). Based on the proposed methods, our designed robot, Mobi, is enable to chat based on its own personality, handle social conflicts and understand user's intent. Such simulations can achieve a high degree of human likeness, characterized by conversations that are flexible and imbued with intention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.