ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Hybrid machine learning for real-time prediction of edema trajectory in large middle cerebral artery stroke.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Brain Imaging Volumetrics and Quantitative Pupillometry for Predicting Neurologic Deterioration after Large Hemispheric Stroke.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Predicting early neurological deterioration in acute branch atheromatous disease without reperfusion therapy: a machine learning model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Research on multimodal interaction intention recognition based on EEG, eye movement, and gesture signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating Brain Imaging Volumetrics and Quantitative Pupillometry for Predicting Neurologic Deterioration after Large Hemispheric Stroke.Research square · 2025Article
- Integrative machine learning models predict prostate cancer diagnosis and biochemical recurrence risk: Advancing precision oncology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In treating malignant cerebral edema after a large middle cerebral artery stroke, clinicians need quantitative tools for real-time risk assessment. Existing predictive models typically estimate risk at one, early time point, failing to account for dynamic variables. To address this, we developed Hybrid Ensemble Learning Models for Edema Trajectory (HELMET) to predict midline shift severity, an established indicator of malignant edema, over 8-h and 24-h windows. The HELMET models were trained on retrospective data from 623 patients and validated on 63 patients from a different hospital system, achieving mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 96.6% and 92.5%, respectively. By integrating transformer-based large language models with supervised ensemble learning, HELMET demonstrates the value of combining clinician expertise with multimodal health records in assessing patient risk. Our approach provides a framework for accurate, real-time estimation of dynamic clinical targets using human-curated and algorithm-derived inputs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.