ArticleScientific reports2025
Design and experiment of key components for self-propelled harvester for Chinese cabbage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and experimental evaluation of an orderly harvesting device for hydroponic leafy vegetables.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Parameter optimization of key components in seed-metering device for pre-cut seed stems of Pennisetum hydridum.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In view of the poor adaptability of the clamping device to different ball diameters and the damage of the pulling device to the bottom of leaf ball in the mechanized harvesting of Chinese cabbage. In order to achieve low-loss and high-efficiency harvesting of Chinese cabbage, a self-propelled Chinese cabbage harvester consisting of clamping conveyor, cutting device and inclined conveyor was designed. Based on the dynamic analysis, the flexible clamping mechanism (maximum clamping force of 152.82 N) and the double disc knife cutting system (rotation speed of 200-400 r min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.