Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379737›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Courtship and spawning behaviour of medaka in a semi-outdoor environment initiating at midnight.

Yuki Kondo, Satoshi Awata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuki KondoLaboratory of Animal Sociology, Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, 558-8585, Japan. youkikondou@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1481-6225
Satoshi AwataLaboratory of Animal Sociology, Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, 558-8585, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3254-7943

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K20666Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H03868Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from the Japan Science Society 2023-5013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive timing is a critical ecological trait that directly influences fitness. Medaka (Oryzias latipes), a small freshwater fish, is widely used as a model organism in various scientific fields. However, ecological studies conducted under (semi-) natural conditions remain limited. Although, spawning has been reported to occur within 1 h before and after sunrise, direct observations remain scarce. We investigated the timing of spawning initiation and associated courtship in medaka through 24-h observations using infrared cameras under semi-natural conditions. During the experiments, sunrise occurred at approximately 4:45. Observations of the 31 pairs revealed that spawning occurred between 1:05-9:48, with a peak at 2:00-4:00. Unlike previous reports but like the most recent fieldwork, only 26% of the total spawning events (8/31) were observed within 1 h before and after sunrise. Male courtship behaviours, including following females and quick circle displays, increased from midnight, peaking between 2:00-5:00. This study provides new insights into the natural reproductive timing of medaka, suggesting a possible adaptation to nocturnal spawning, likely as a strategy to reduce predation on both parents and eggs. It also underscores the importance of investigating the ecology of model organisms under (semi-)natural conditions to gain a more comprehensive understanding of biological phenomena observed in laboratory settings.

Indexed as

CourtshipOryziasReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleCourtshipMedakaModel organismOryzias latipesSpawningVideo observation

Identifiers

PMID40379737
PMCPMC12084311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.