ArticleScientific reports2025
FISH unveils a unified method for multi-marker biodose assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radon-Induced Radiation Biomarkers: A Scoping Review from Exposure Dosimetry to Early Biological Effects on the Lung.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Retarded DNA DSB repair kinetics and augmented radiation sensitivity in Wiskott Aldrich syndrome patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pan centromeric FISH enhances precision in radiation biodosimetry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- First evidence of coexistence of Pseudo Pelger Huet anomaly and balanced translocation in a two decades retrospectively exposed human subject.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Current Status and Developments in Biodosimetry Research in India.Journal of medical physicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate dose assessment following radiation disasters or accidents is crucial for informed medical interventions. Cytogenetic biomarkers, such as dicentrics (dic), translocations, and chromosomal fragments, are essential for radiation biodosimetry in various exposure scenarios. However, quantifying these markers via separate staining and detection methods presents challenges in terms of efficiency and consistency. This study aimed to quantify multiple cytogenetic markers, including dic, balanced and unbalanced translocations and acentric fragments, from the same metaphases via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). By enabling multimarker dose estimation from a single sample, this approach minimizes interexperimental variation and improves overall accuracy. Independent calibration curves were generated for each marker, enabling precise dose estimation with smaller class intervals, in accordance with the IAEA and ISO guidelines. The method was validated by estimating doses for five blinded samples via both standard cytogenetic methods and protein biomarkers (γH2AX and 53BP1). The multimarker approach yielded the closest estimates with 2-7% variation from true doses, providing the most accurate results among all cytogenetic techniques. This unified FISH-based approach enhances the precision of dose estimation for both recent and past radiation exposures, offering a more reliable tool for diverse biodosimetry applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.