ArticleScientific data2025
The "LLM World of Words" English free association norms generated by large language models.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subcategory vs category fluency: Items and networks in healthy young adults and simulation with a large language model.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Automatic quantification of lexical ambiguity using large-scale word association data.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Evaluating large language models for pharmacotherapy simulations: a mixed-methods study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Free Association Database for a 62-Word Dataset Including Emotion and Colour Terms in English, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Lithuanian, and Spanish: Data from 14 Countries.Journal of open psychology data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free associations have been extensively used in psychology and linguistics for studying how conceptual knowledge is organized. Recently, the potential of applying a similar approach for investigating the knowledge encoded in LLMs has emerged, specifically as a method for investigating LLM biases. However, the absence of large-scale LLM-generated free association norms that are comparable with human-generated norms is an obstacle to this research direction. To address this, we create a new dataset of LLM-generated free association norms modeled after the "Small World of Words"(SWOW) human-generated norms with nearly 12,000 cue words. We prompt three LLMs (Mistral, Llama3, and Haiku) with the same cues as those in SWOW to generate three novel comparable datasets, the "LLM World of Words" (LWOW). From the datasets, we construct network models of semantic memory that represent the conceptual knowledge possessed by humans and LLMs. We validate the datasets by simulating semantic priming within the network models, and we briefly discuss how the datasets can be used for investigating implicit biases in humans and LLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.