Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379703›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

The "LLM World of Words" English free association norms generated by large language models.

Katherine Abramski, Riccardo Improta, Giulio Rossetti, Massimo Stella

Erratum issuedAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine AbramskiUniversity of Pisa, Department of Computer Science, Pisa, Italy. katherine.abramski@phd.unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4210-5498
Riccardo ImprotaUniversity of Trento, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8383-3114
Giulio Rossetti *National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Information Science and Technologies, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-1240
Massimo Stella *University of Trento, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Trento, Italy. massimo.stella-1@unitn.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free associations have been extensively used in psychology and linguistics for studying how conceptual knowledge is organized. Recently, the potential of applying a similar approach for investigating the knowledge encoded in LLMs has emerged, specifically as a method for investigating LLM biases. However, the absence of large-scale LLM-generated free association norms that are comparable with human-generated norms is an obstacle to this research direction. To address this, we create a new dataset of LLM-generated free association norms modeled after the "Small World of Words"(SWOW) human-generated norms with nearly 12,000 cue words. We prompt three LLMs (Mistral, Llama3, and Haiku) with the same cues as those in SWOW to generate three novel comparable datasets, the "LLM World of Words" (LWOW). From the datasets, we construct network models of semantic memory that represent the conceptual knowledge possessed by humans and LLMs. We validate the datasets by simulating semantic priming within the network models, and we briefly discuss how the datasets can be used for investigating implicit biases in humans and LLMs.

Indexed as

HumansLarge Language ModelsMemorySemantics

Identifiers

PMID40379703
PMCPMC12084308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.