Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379680›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Trait macroevolution in the presence of covariates.

Mark Pagel, Andrew Meade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark PagelSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. m.pagel@reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-8865
Andrew MeadeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical characterisations of traits evolving on phylogenies combine the contributions of unique and shared influences on those traits, potentially confusing the interpretation of historical events of macroevolution. The Fabric model, introduced in 2022, identifies historical events of directional shifts in traits (e.g. becoming larger/smaller, faster/slower over evolutionary time) and of changes in macroevolutionary 'evolvability' or the realised historical ability of a trait to explore its trait-space. Here we extend the model to accommodate situations in which the trait is correlated with one or more covarying traits. The Fabric-regression model identifies a unique component of variance in the trait that is free of influences from correlated traits, while simultaneously estimating directional and evolvability effects. We show in a dataset of 1504 Mammalian species that inferences about historical directional shifts in brain size and in its evolvability, having accounted for body size, differ qualitatively from inferences about brain size alone, including finding many new effects not visible in the whole trait. A class of fundamental macroevolutionary questions awaits testing on the variation uniquely attributable to traits, and the ability to accommodate statistically one or more covariates opens the possibility of bringing the formal methods of causal inference to phylogenetic-comparative studies.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMammalsAnimalsBody SizeBrainOrgan SizePhenotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID40379680
PMCPMC12084356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.