Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379678›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting hospital outpatient volume using XGBoost: a machine learning approach.

Lingling Zhou, Qin Zhu, Qian Chen, Ping Wang, Hao Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lingling Zhou *Department of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Qin Zhu *Department of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Qian ChenDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Ping WangDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Hao HuangDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China. zllgwy@tmmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-7077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital outpatient volume is influenced by a variety of factors, including environmental conditions and healthcare resource availability. Accurate prediction of outpatient demand can significantly enhance operational efficiency and optimize the allocation of medical resources. This study aims to develop a predictive model for daily hospital outpatient volume using the XGBoost algorithm. Meanwhile, the forecasting performance was compared with that of the Seasonal AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average with exogenous regressors (SARIMAX) and Random Forest (RF) models. The dataset comprises daily climate data (e.g., temperature, precipitation, PM2.5 levels), historical outpatient volume records, and the number of outpatient specialists available each day. The data range involved spans from January 1, 2014, to October 31, 2024. Data preprocessing involved addressing missing values and encoding categorical variables. Model performance was assessed using three metrics: Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) , Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and R-squared (R

Indexed as

Machine LearningOutpatientsAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsForecastingHumansClimate dataHospital resource planningMachine learningOutpatient volumePredictive analyticsXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40379678
PMCPMC12084583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.