Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379668›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Pitch biases sensorimotor synchronization to auditory rhythms.

Jesse K Pazdera, Laurel J Trainor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Groove strength is associated with corticalFrontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jesse K PazderaDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. pazderaj@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-9236
Laurel J TrainorDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) MOP 153130Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2019-05416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current models of rhythm perception propose that humans track musical beats using the phase, period, and amplitude of sound patterns. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that pitch can also influence the perceived timing of auditory signals. In the present study, we conducted two experiments to investigate whether pitch affects the phase and period of sensorimotor synchronization. To do so, we asked participants to synchronize with a repeating tone, whose pitch on each trial was drawn from one of six different octaves (110-3520 Hz). In Experiment 1, we observed U-shaped patterns in both mean asynchrony and continuation tapping rates, with participants tapping latest and slowest when synchronizing to low and extremely high (above 2000 Hz) pitches, and tapping earliest and fastest to moderately high pitches. In Experiment 2, we found that extremely high pitches still produced slower timing than moderately high pitches when participants were exposed to an exclusively high-pitched context. Based on our results, we advocate for the incorporation of pitch into models of rhythm perception and discuss possible origins of these effects.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionPitch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMusicTime PerceptionYoung AdultAuditoryContinuation tappingPerceptual biasPitchSensorimotor synchronizationTempo

Identifiers

PMID40379668
PMCPMC12084412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.