Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379665›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning progressive distill for predicting clinical response to conversion therapy from preoperative CT images of advanced gastric cancer patients.

Saiyi Han, Tong Zhang, Wenzhuo Deng, Shaoliang Han, Honghao Wu, Beier Jiang, Weidong Xie, Yide Chen, Tao Deng, Xuewen Wen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Saiyi Han *The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Tong Zhang *The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Wenzhuo DengThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Shaoliang HanDepartment of The Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Honghao WuThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Beier JiangThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Weidong XieDepartment of The Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Yide ChenThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Tao DengDepartment of The Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Xuewen WenThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Nianbo LiuThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Jianping FanThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, PR China. hsy2726@126.com.

Funding

Municipal Government of Quzhou 2023D007, 2023D015, 2023D033, 2023D034, 2023D035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIdentifying patients suitable for conversion therapy through early non-invasive screening is crucial for tailoring treatment in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning method, utilizing preoperative computed tomography (CT) images, to predict the response to conversion therapy in AGC patients. This retrospective study involved 140 patients. We utilized Progressive Distill (PD) methodology to construct a deep learning model for predicting clinical response to conversion therapy based on preoperative CT images. Patients in the training set (n = 112) and in the test set (n = 28) were sourced from The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between September 2017 and November 2023. Our PD models' performance was compared with baseline models and those utilizing Knowledge Distillation (KD), with evaluation metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), and heat maps. The PD model exhibited the best performance, demonstrating robust discrimination of clinical response to conversion therapy with an AUC of 0.99 and accuracy of 99.11% in the training set, and 0.87 AUC and 85.71% accuracy in the test set. Sensitivity and specificity were 97.44% and 100% respectively in the training set, 85.71% and 85.71% each in the test set, suggesting absence of discernible bias. The deep learning model of PD method accurately predicts clinical response to conversion therapy in AGC patients. Further investigation is warranted to assess its clinical utility alongside clinicopathological parameters.

Indexed as

Deep LearningStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeAdvanced gastricCancer conversionLearningPreoperativeProgressive distillTherapy deep

Identifiers

PMID40379665
PMCPMC12084415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.