ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning progressive distill for predicting clinical response to conversion therapy from preoperative CT images of advanced gastric cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of explainable artificial intelligence integrating with electronic health record in oncology.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Data-driven strategies for immunoradiotherapy in uveal melanoma: the role of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIdentifying patients suitable for conversion therapy through early non-invasive screening is crucial for tailoring treatment in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning method, utilizing preoperative computed tomography (CT) images, to predict the response to conversion therapy in AGC patients. This retrospective study involved 140 patients. We utilized Progressive Distill (PD) methodology to construct a deep learning model for predicting clinical response to conversion therapy based on preoperative CT images. Patients in the training set (n = 112) and in the test set (n = 28) were sourced from The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between September 2017 and November 2023. Our PD models' performance was compared with baseline models and those utilizing Knowledge Distillation (KD), with evaluation metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), and heat maps. The PD model exhibited the best performance, demonstrating robust discrimination of clinical response to conversion therapy with an AUC of 0.99 and accuracy of 99.11% in the training set, and 0.87 AUC and 85.71% accuracy in the test set. Sensitivity and specificity were 97.44% and 100% respectively in the training set, 85.71% and 85.71% each in the test set, suggesting absence of discernible bias. The deep learning model of PD method accurately predicts clinical response to conversion therapy in AGC patients. Further investigation is warranted to assess its clinical utility alongside clinicopathological parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.