Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379473›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2025

Promoting Nordic 'Green Care Practices'.

Nanna Holt Jessen, Stefan Hjørleifsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nanna Holt JessenResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stefan HjørleifssonDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-0161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change poses an urgent threat to human health, with thousands of deaths already attributed to extreme heat. In the Nordic countries, where per capita emissions are particularly high, healthcare accounts for 4.2-6.3% of emissions, highlighting the need for immediate action to reduce its climate impact. Evidence supporting sustainable climate solutions in healthcare is steadily growing. Greenhouse gas emissions in general practice can be broadly divided into those arising from clinical activities, such as patient examination, diagnosis, and treatment, and those from non-clinical activities, including clinic operations, energy use, and transportation by staff and patients. In this opinion paper, we discuss and advocate 'Green Care Practices' to minimize greenhouse gas emissions specifically related to clinical activities. We believe that Nordic general practitioners can adopt 'Green Care' to significantly reduce healthcare-related emissions while improving patient outcomes, enhancing efficiency, and promoting environmentally responsible healthcare. Strong primary healthcare, rooted in Nordic values, can support the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals by simultaneously mitigating climate change, reducing inequalities, fostering community stability, and promoting health and well-being. Thus, GPs can ensure sustainability for future generations.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDelivery of Health CareGeneral PracticeGreenhouse GasesPrimary Health CareHumansScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSustainable DevelopmentGreenhouse Gasesclimate mitigationGeneral practicegreen carepublic healthsustainability

Identifiers

PMID40379473
PMCPMC12687895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.