ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Successful Distal Radial Artery Puncture for Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hemodynamically Unstable Patients.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is essential for critically ill patients. This case series evaluates the efficacy of distal radial artery (dRA) puncture for invasive ABP monitoring, focusing on procedural success, patient outcomes, and procedural limitations. Three patients with acute coronary syndromes underwent dRA puncture for invasive ABP monitoring after percutaneous coronary intervention. The procedures were successful, with no significant complications. The use of dRA preserved proximal radial artery function and improved patient comfort. dRA is a viable alternative to conventional radial artery access for ABP monitoring; the potential benefits include reduced complications and preserved arterial function. The key points to avoid puncture complications include accurately assessing the location of the arterial pulse, using a modified Seldinger technique, avoiding forceful maneuvers, and applying adequate pressure after catheter removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.