Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379363›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Psychiatry2025

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus treatment as usual after non-remission with NHS Talking Therapies high-intensity psychological therapy for depression: a UK-based clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised, controlled, superiority trial.

Thorsten Barnhofer, Barnaby D Dunn, Clara Strauss, Florian A Ruths, Barbara Barrett, Mary Ryan, Asha Ladwa, Frances Stafford, Roberta Fichera, Hannah Baber and 11 more

Abstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Thorsten BarnhoferDepartment of Psychological Interventions, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. Electronic address: t.barnhofer@surrey.ac.uk.
Barnaby D DunnMood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Clara StraussSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK; School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Florian A RuthsSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Barbara BarrettKing's Health Economics, King's College London, London, UK.
Mary RyanNational Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Asha LadwaMood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Frances StaffordSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK.
Roberta FicheraSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hannah BaberDevon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Ailis McGuinnessMood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Isabella MetcalfeSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daniel K Y KanMood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Joanna PooleySussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK.
Delilah HardingSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emma TassieKing's Health Economics, King's College London, London, UK.
James CarsonMood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Shelley RhodesExeter Clinical Trials Unit, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Allan H YoungDivision of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
James ConnorsExeter Clinical Trials Unit, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Fiona C WarrenExeter Clinical Trials Unit, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-remission after psychological therapy for major depressive disorder is common, yet there are no established further-line treatments. In the UK National Health Service (NHS) Talking Therapies programme, about 50% of patients with depression who come to the end of the stepped care pathway do not show remission of symptoms. We aimed to investigate whether mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) can improve clinical outcomes and whether the additional financial cost is worthwhile.

methodsWe conducted a parallel, randomised, controlled, superiority trial in three sites in the UK (Devon, London, and Sussex). Patients with current major depressive disorder whose symptoms had not reached remission (assessed as Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] score ≥10) after an adequate dose of NHS Talking Therapies high-intensity therapy (≥12 sessions) were recruited from 20 NHS Talking Therapies services. Participants were allocated through remote random assignment (1:1) to MBCT plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone at the UK Clinical Research Collaboration-registered Exeter Clinical Trials Unit with minimisation on depression severity (PHQ-9 score <19 vs ≥19), antidepressant use at baseline (yes vs no), and recruitment site (Devon vs London vs Sussex). MBCT was delivered via videoconference and comprised an individual orientation session and eight weekly group sessions. The primary clinical outcome was reduction in depression symptomatology at 34 weeks after randomisation, using the PHQ-9. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in terms of costs to primary, secondary, and tertiary health and social care services collected using the Adult Service Use Schedule and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) via health utilities derived from the EQ-5D. Primary outcome analyses were masked in the intention-to-treat population using observed data only. Lived experience experts were integral to all stages of this research. The trial was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN17755571.

findingsBetween April 20, 2021, and Jan 24, 2023, we enrolled 234 eligible participants, 166 (71%) of whom identified as women, 65 (28%) as men, one (<1%) as other, and two (1%) preferred not to say. The mean age was 42·5 years (SD 13·9). 201 (86%) of 234 participants were White. 118 participants were assigned to MBCT plus treatment as usual and 116 to treatment as usual alone, 101 and 102 of whom completed the final follow-up, respectively. At 34 weeks after randomisation, the MBCT plus treatment as usual group had significantly lower levels of depression symptomatology than the treatment as usual alone group (adjusted between-group difference -2·49, 95% CI -3·89 to -1·09; p=0·0006; Cohen's d -0·41, 95% CI -0·67 to -0·15). Utility scores were higher and costs were lower in the MBCT group (adjusted mean cost difference -£245·23, 95% CI -581·92 to 91·46; p=0·15) over the course of the study. The MBCT plus treatment as usual group had an estimated 99% chance of being cost-effective at the £20 000 per QALY threshold. Bootstrapped mean differences in costs and QALYs indicated a 91% probability of MBCT plus treatment as usual being less costly and more effective than treatment as usual alone for all values a decision maker might be willing to pay for an improvement in QALYs. We observed no trial or treatment-related serious adverse events and no other evidence of harms.

interpretationOur findings show that mindfulness-based treatment can be beneficial after non-remission from major depressive disorder following psychological, stepped care treatments. Together with evidence from previous studies of non-remission after pharmacological treatment, our findings establish MBCT, an easily scalable group-based intervention, as a further-line treatment. Implementation of MBCT for patients who continue to have major depressive disorder in routine care settings (NHS Talking Therapies and beyond) is warranted.

fundingUK National Institute for Health and Care Research Research for Patient Benefit programme.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMajor Depressive DisorderMindfulnessAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsState MedicineTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40379363
PMCPMC12078190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.