Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379343›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2025

Patient Bridge Role: a new approach for patient and public involvement in healthcare research programmes.

Beccy Summers, Leon Farmer, Sharon Cooper, Christian von Wagner, Bettina Friedrich, Gary A Abel, Anne Spencer, Emma Cockcroft

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beccy SummersApplied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Team, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK r.l.summers@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2136-3272
Leon FarmerPPIE, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Sharon CooperUniversity of Exeter Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Exeter, UK.
Christian von WagnerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7971-0691
Bettina FriedrichUniversity College London, London, UK.
Gary A AbelUniversity of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-5161
Anne SpencerHealth Economics, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Emma CockcroftClinical Trials Unit, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and public involvement (PPI) in research involves an active collaboration between patients/members of the public and researchers in equal partnership. PPI in health research ensures the research benefits those most impacted by the research and is a well-established necessity of high-quality research. PPI for large programmes of work involving multiple studies frequently relies on a single PPI group that oversees the entire programme. We believe that this 'traditional' approach can negatively contribute to the power imbalance between researchers and PPI members, since PPI members have a very wide remit and are unable to embed themselves fully in all aspects of the research.

aimThe study aimed to evaluate a novel PPI approach, the 'Patient Bridge Role', designed to promote a more equal distribution of power between public collaborators and researchers in a large research programme. The Patient Bridge Role involves assigning specific public collaborators to each work package, facilitating deeper engagement and communication. MAIN ARGUMENT: The Patient Bridge Role addresses the limitations of traditional PPI. This approach requires clear role definitions and collaborative development of guidelines to ensure effective communication and shared decision-making. Despite initial challenges related to role clarity and boundaries, the Patient Bridge Roles successfully promoted a more balanced partnership between researchers and public collaborators.

conclusionsActive partnerships between public collaborators and researchers are critical to creating more relevant and higher quality research. Yet, there are many practical and conceptual barriers to this. The Patient Bridge Role offers a promising strategy for enhancing PPI in large research programmes.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth Services ResearchPatient ParticipationCommunicationCooperative BehaviorHumansResearch PersonnelPatient ParticipationPatientsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID40379343
PMCPMC12083370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.