ArticleBMJ open2025
PARIS coronary thrombosis risk score combined with D-dimer to guide new oral anticoagulant antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: study protocol for the PRIDE-ACS trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05638867 (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of PARIS Coronary Thrombosis Risk Score Combined With D-dimer to Guide New Oral Anticoagulant Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of PARIS Coronary Thrombosis Risk Score Combined With D-dimer to Guide New Oral Anticoagulant Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResidual thrombosis risk is an important contributor to ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although previous studies have shown that rivaroxaban 2.5 mg two times per day in ACS patients with high ischaemic risk can significantly reduce the risk of ischaemic recurrence and mortality, individualised treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban is still rare. Using D-dimer and PARIS (Patterns of non-Adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimen in Stented Patients) coronary thrombosis risk score to identify ACS patients at high ischaemic risk, we aim to investigate whether 3-month low-dose rivaroxaban therapy on the basis of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) could result in reduced ischaemic events without increasing bleeding. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial involving 3944 ACS patients undergoing PCI from more than 40 tertiary hospitals in China (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05638867). Patients with PARIS coronary thrombosis score ≥3 or D-dimer ≥0.28 µg/mL will be 1:1 randomised to the experimental group (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg two times per day for 3 months on the basis of 1 year standard DAPT) or the control group (1 year standard DAPT only). The primary endpoint of this study is major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischaemia-driven revascularisation and systemic embolic events. The safety endpoint is Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 and 5 bleeding events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval by the Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital was obtained on 22 April 2023 (Approval No. 2023-1980). The investigators will have access to the final dataset. Trial results will be made public through publication in professional journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05638867.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.