Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379325›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Challenging behaviours in interprofessional teamwork in the intensive care unit: a qualitative content analysis of focus group interviews.

Karin Jonsson, Christine Brulin, Magnus Hultin, Maria Härgestam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karin JonssonDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden karin.jonsson@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-6777
Christine BrulinDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.
Magnus HultinDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-7161
Maria HärgestamDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-9962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore interprofessional team members' experiences of teamwork at an intensive care unit.

designQualitative content analysis of focus group interviews with members from the intensive care teams.

settingUniversity hospital in Sweden.

participantsIn total, 31 participants were interviewed. Enrolled nurses (n=7), critical care registered nurses (n=16), and intensive care physicians (n=8) employed at an intensive care unit were divided into nine focus groups organised according to the profession.

resultsThe overall theme, Balancing behaviour and knowledge in teamwork, emerged from the two categories of creating a safe atmosphere when working in an unknown environment and counteracting and mitigating destructive team dynamics. The theme captures how well-functioning teamwork must take into account members not acting as team players while also building a secure environment when working in new surroundings outside the intensive care unit. The categories describe how mutual respect, effective teamwork and a safe atmosphere were fostered through support without taking over tasks and countering power structures.

conclusionsNavigating teamwork during critical situations is inherently complex, making it essential to understand team interactions and factors influencing individual behaviour. To ensure patient safety, the interprofessional team must recognise, understand and manage diverse behaviours and knowledge in dynamic settings. This research contributes to existing knowledge on teamwork in the intensive care context by providing insights into how knowledge and behaviour in teamwork can be optimised to enhance patient safety.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorIntensive Care UnitsInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenBehaviorClinical CompetenceDecision MakingIntensive Care UnitsInterprofessional Relations

Identifiers

PMID40379325
PMCPMC12083260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.