Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379322›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Sociodemographic factors associated with psychosocial consequences of false-positive colorectal cancer screening: a prospective cohort study.

Emma Grundtvig Gram, Jessica Á Rogvi, Volkert Siersma, Dagny Ros Nicolaisdottir, John Brandt Brodersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma Grundtvig GramCentre for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark emma.gram@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8519-8217
Jessica Á RogviCentre for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Volkert SiersmaCentre for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dagny Ros NicolaisdottirCentre for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John Brandt BrodersenCentre for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReceiving a false positive in colorectal cancer screening is associated with psychosocial consequences, yet the reasons why some people are more affected than others remain unclear. This study examines the association between sociodemographic factors and psychosocial consequences among screening participants with false positives in colorectal cancer screening.

designProspective cohort study.

participants1432 screening participants with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening with a follow-up colonoscopy with either no abnormalities or benign polyps (low or medium-high risk). OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured psychosocial consequences with the Consequences Of Screening - ColoRectal Cancer (COS-CRC) questionnaire, after the positive FIT but before the follow-up colonoscopy and again 1 year later. Sociodemographic factors were obtained from national registers and included sex, age, urbanicity, educational level, occupational status, income, assets, cohabitation status and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Psychosocial consequences were measured before colonoscopy (baseline) and 1 year after, and sociodemographic factors were assessed at baseline.

resultsWe tested 19×2×3=114 associations between the sociodemographic factors and psychosocial consequences within the three groups of false positives and five associations were significant. We found that for participants with medium- and high-risk polyps, experiencing short-term psychosocial consequences was significantly associated with having a university degree compared with secondary school (OR=5.04 (1.38; 18.37), p=0.0142) and being unemployed compared with being employed (OR=5.61 (1.42; 22.14), p=0.0139). For participants with low-risk polyps, long-term consequences were significantly associated with the mid-income quartile (OR=2.32 (1.13; 4.76), p=0.0224) and the highest income quartile (OR=5.47 (1.13; 26.48), p=0.0349) compared with the lowest quartile. For participants with no abnormalities, there was an association between short-term psychosocial consequences and having comorbidities compared with none (OR=2.95 (1.13; 7.71), p=0.0277).

conclusionThis study found few significant associations between psychosocial consequences and sociodemographic factors and with no apparent pattern in these. This suggests no strong evidence that specific sociodemographic groups should be especially vulnerable to experiencing psychosocial consequences after a false-positive result from colorectal cancer screening. Thus, there is currently weak evidence for identifying screening participants at higher risk for psychosocial consequences and developing targeted interventions to reduce psychosocial consequences.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedColonoscopyFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccult BloodProspective StudiesSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesGastrointestinal tumoursMass ScreeningPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPsychometricsPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID40379322
PMCPMC12086893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.