Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40379319›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

One-week regimen for postoperative regional irradiation in breast cancer: the ARROW trial protocol.

Jinrong Xie, Siyue Zheng, Wei-Xiang Qi, Lu Gan, Bo Yu, Juan Jiang, Jie Zhang, Yonggang Shi, Meilian Dong, Gang Cai and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04509648 (One-week Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With an Indication for Regional Nodal Irradiation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04509648 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

One-week Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With an Indication for Regional Nodal Irradiation: Prospective, Single-arm Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2021 to 2030Enrolled197ConditionsBreast CancerArmsExternal Beam radiotherapy using IMRT technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jinrong Xie *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-7367
Siyue Zheng *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Wei-Xiang QiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-3343
Lu GanOncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Bo YuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Jiangyin People's Hospital, Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China.
Juan JiangOncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jie ZhangOncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yonggang ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Meilian DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Gang CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Rong CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Cheng XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Haoping XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaofang QianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yibin ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Mei ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Lu CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China cjy11756@rjh.com.cn cl11879@rjh.com.cn.
Jiayi ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China cjy11756@rjh.com.cn cl11879@rjh.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-622X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShortening the duration of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer while maintaining efficacy and safety has become a significant trend. The 3-week regimen of 40-42.5 Gy in 15-16 fractions is now a preferred option in clinical practice. Following the publication of the 5-year outcomes from the Fast-Forward trial, interest in 1-week regimens has surged, prompting the initiation of multiple studies. However, trials exploring the 1-week regimen for regional nodal irradiation (RNI), especially involving internal mammary nodes (IMN), remain scarce. Additionally, the optimal fractionation scheme for tumour bed boost in the era of ultra-hypofractionated regimens is still debated. To address these gaps, we initiated the adjuvant regional nodal radiation therapy for one week in breast cancer (ARROW) trial to evaluate the feasibility of a 1-week regimen for RNI of 26 Gy in five fractions, with optional sequential tumour bed boost of 10.4 Gy in two fractions. The findings from our trial are expected to extend the application of ultra-hypofractionated regimens to include sequential tumour bed boosts and RNI, pioneering its use in IMN irradiation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ARROW trial is an open-label, single-arm, multicentre phase II trial, encompassing four teaching hospitals in China. Enrolled patients will receive a total of 26 Gy in five fractions to ipsilateral whole breast/chest wall and regional regions, including supraclavicular/infraclavicular nodes, IMN and any portion of the undissected axilla deemed at risk. A sequential tumour bed boost of 10.4 Gy in two fractions is delivered in patients at high risk for recurrence, which is at the discretion of the radiation oncologist. The sample size for the ARROW trial was 197 patients. Both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy are permitted. The primary endpoint is acute radiation-induced toxicity, graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria and CTCAE V.3.0. Secondary endpoints include cosmetic outcomes for breast-conserving surgery, late radiation-induced toxicity, local regional recurrence, distant metastasis, invasive tumour-free survival, overall survival and quality-of-life assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, as well as approvals from the ethical committees of each participating centre have also been obtained. Research findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ARROW trial: NCT04509648.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansRadiotherapy, AdjuvantTime FactorsBreast tumoursRadiation oncologyRADIOTHERAPY

Identifiers

PMID40379319
PMCPMC12083394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.