ArticleBMJ global health2025
Conceptualisation of critical health literacy-insights from Western and East Asian perspectives: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empowering Patients Through Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Educational App for Evaluating Complementary Therapies in Diabetes Management.Nursing open · 2026Trial
- Understanding how food literacy is characterized and measured in the Pacific Islands region: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Co-Creation of Interventions to Promote Critical Health Literacy in the Community: Study Protocol.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Exploring a model of critical health literacy among Chinese physical education teachers: a grounded theory approach.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Health Literacy in Early Primary Education: A Multimodal Critical Analysis of Greek Grade 1 Textbooks.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Health literacy and its associated factors among older adults in Taiwan: The role of media use and healthcare experience.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes a scoping review of components of critical health literacy (CHL) and examines how these components have been conceptualised, highlighting fundamental differences from the Western and East Asian perspectives. The review includes 23 studies, with the majority (n=19) from Western countries and only two from East Asia. Three primary components of CHL were identified: 'information appraisal', 'understanding of social determinants of health (SDH)' and 'actions to address SDH'. The findings indicate that these prevailing components of CHL are largely grounded in Western social structures, while East Asian studies primarily focused on the first component. Given the distinct social and cultural norms in these regions, this study explored the potential differences in how social factors influencing health are understood and prioritised in Western versus East Asian contexts. From a Western universalistic perspective, actions to address SDH often involve political and social movements aimed at improving individual and community health. However, such actions may not be feasible or relevant for many East Asian population groups, who may have more limited opportunities to engage in Western-style social movements, and culturally, have a stronger focus on family and local community. Furthermore, building on the theory of 'distributed health literacy', we argued that interpersonal-level actions to address SDH are also crucial and can serve as a stepping stone to social-level actions, which have been more extensively discussed in Western literature. We conclude that CHL is a context-specific concept, and its definition and practical application need further examination across different contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.