ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Evaluating machine learning algorithms for predicting HIV status among young Thai men who have sex with men.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict HIV status and assessed the factors associated with HIV infection among young men who have sex with men (MSM) under the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) programme in Thailand.
methodsYoung MSM aged 15-24 years who underwent HIV testing through the UHC programme from 2015 to 2022 were included. Data were divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets, with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) applied to address data set imbalance. ML models, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbour (KNN), random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and AdaBoost, were used to predict HIV infection.
resultsAmong 146 813 young MSM, 11% were diagnosed with HIV. While KNN initially outperformed other ML models, the sensitivity of all models using the original data set was low due to imbalanced data. After applying SMOTE, the XGB model showed the best performance with an accuracy of 0.72, sensitivity of 0.73, specificity of 0.72 and the area under the curve of 0.72. The top predictors of HIV infection were the year of HIV testing (68%), age (55%) and targeted HIV testing (54%). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the potential of ML models, particularly XGB, in predicting HIV infection among young MSM in Thailand under the UHC programme. The application of SMOTE improved model sensitivity, addressing data imbalance and enhancing predictive accuracy.
conclusionsML models have the potential to enhance HIV risk assessment and inform targeted prevention strategies for high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.