Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40378835›Full record

ArticleNeuron2025

Network influence determines the impact of cortical ensembles on stimulus detection.

Hayley A Bounds, Hillel Adesnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tuft Dendrite Spikes Are Accompanied by Selective Input From Distinct Functional Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Importance of Synchrony in the Neural Control of Movement.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatiotemporal Divergence Between Intrinsic And Evoked Cortical Activity Predicts Visual Detection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hayley A BoundsDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; The Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Hillel AdesnikDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; The Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA. Electronic address: hadesnik@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Excitation and Inhibition in Neural Circuits of the Visual CortexR01EY023756 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Hillel Adesnik · 2013 to 2026
$6.1M
High speed, high precision volumetric multiphoton neural controlUF1NS107574 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ADESNIK, HILLEL · 2018 to 2018
$5.1M
Mesoscale bidirectional two-photon holographic optogeneticsRF1NS128772 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ADESNIK, HILLEL · 2022 to 2022
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023756NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS128772NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS107574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causally connecting neural activity patterns to behavioral decisions is essential to understand the neural code but requires direct perturbation of the pattern of interest with high specificity. We combined two-photon imaging and cellular-resolution holographic optogenetic photostimulation to causally test how neural activity in the mouse visual cortex is read out to detect visual stimuli. Contrary to expectations, targeted activation of visually sensitive neural ensembles did not preferentially modify behavior compared with targeting randomly selected ensembles. Instead, an activated ensemble's effect on local network activity was the main predictor of its impact on perception. This suggests that downstream regions summate visual cortex activity without preferentially weighting more informative neurons, a notion confirmed by analyzing the impact of photostimulation on decoding models of neural activity. This work challenges conventional notions for how sensory representations mediate perception and demonstrates that perturbing activity is essential to determine which features of neural activity drive behavior.

Indexed as

Nerve NetVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleHolographyMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeuronsOptogeneticsPhotic StimulationStereotaxic Techniquescortical ensemblesdecodingGCaMP6holographic optogeneticsneural codesoptogeneticsstimulus detectiontwo-photon imagingvisual codingvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID40378835
PMCPMC12934253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.