ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Automatic head and neck tumor segmentation through deep learning and Bayesian optimization on three-dimensional medical images.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical imaging constitutes critical information in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients, as it serves to uncover a broad spectrum of pathologies and deviances. Clinical practitioners who carry out medical image screening are primarily reliant on their knowledge and experience for disease diagnosis. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) hold the potential to serve as a formidable decision-support tool in the realm of medical image analysis due to their high capacity to extract hierarchical features and effectuate direct classification and segmentation from image data. However, CNNs contain a myriad of hyperparameters and optimizing these hyperparameters poses a major obstacle to the effective implementation of CNNs. In this work, a two-phase Bayesian Optimization-derived Scheduling (BOS) approach is proposed for hyperparameter optimization for the head and cancerous tissue segmentation tasks. We proposed this two-phase BOS approach to incorporate both rapid convergences in the first training phase and slower (but without overfitting) improvements in the last training phase. Furthermore, we found that batch size and learning rate have a significant impact on the training process, but optimizing them separately can lead to sub-optimal hyperparameter combinations. Therefore, batch size and learning rate have been coupled as the batch size to learning rate (B2L) ratio and utilized in the optimization process to optimize both simultaneously. The optimized hyperparameters have been tested for a three-dimensional V-Net model with computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans to segment and classify cancerous and noncancerous tissues. The results of 10-fold cross-validation indicate that the optimal batch size to learning rate (B2L) ratio for each phase of the training method can improve the overall medical image segmentation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.