Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40378351›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Assessing perioperative risks in a mixed elderly surgical population using machine learning: A multi-objective symbolic regression approach to cardiorespiratory fitness derived from cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

Pietro Arina, Davide Ferrari, Maciej R Kaczorek, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, Ramani Moonesinghe, Mervyn Singer, John Whittle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pietro ArinaBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-5274
Davide FerrariDepartment of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-4157
Maciej R KaczorekWellcome/EPSRC Centre of Interventional and Surgical Sciences and Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas TetlowHuman Physiology and Performance Laboratory, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amy DewarHuman Physiology and Performance Laboratory, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Robert StephensHuman Physiology and Performance Laboratory, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel MartinPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Ramani MoonesingheHuman Physiology and Performance Laboratory, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mervyn SingerBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
John WhittleHuman Physiology and Performance Laboratory, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3859-679X
Evangelos B MazomenosWellcome/EPSRC Centre of Interventional and Surgical Sciences and Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate preoperative risk assessment is of great value to both patients and clinical teams. Several risk scores have been developed but are often not calibrated to the local institution, limited in terms of data input into the underlying models, and/or lack individual precision. Machine Learning (ML) models have the potential to address limitations in existing scoring systems. A database of 1190 elderly patients who underwent major elective surgery was analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative cardiorespiratory fitness data from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), demographic and clinical data were extracted and integrated into advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms. Multi-Objective-Symbolic-Regression (MOSR), a novel algorithm utilizing Genetic Programming to generate mathematical formulae for learning tasks, was employed to predict patient morbidity at Postoperative Day 3, as defined by the PostOperative Morbidity Survey (POMS). Shapley-Additive-exPlanations (SHAP) was subsequently used to analyze feature contributions. Model performance was benchmarked against existing risk prediction scores, namely the Portsmouth-Physiological-and-Operative-Severity-Score-for-the-Enumeration-of-Mortality-and-Morbidity (PPOSSUM) and the Duke-Activity-Status-Index, as well as linear regression using CPET features. A model was also developed for the same task using data directly extracted from the CPET time-series. The incorporation of cardiorespiratory fitness data enhanced the performance of all models for predicting postoperative morbidity by 20% compared to sole reliance on clinical data. Cardiorespiratory fitness features demonstrated greater importance than clinical features in the SHAP analysis. Models utilizing data taken directly from the CPET time-series demonstrated a 12% improvement over the cardiorespiratory fitness models. MOSR model surpassed all other models in every experiment, demonstrating excellent robustness and generalization capabilities. Integrating cardiorespiratory fitness data with ML models enables improved preoperative prediction of postoperative morbidity in elective surgical patients. The MOSR model stands out for its capacity to pinpoint essential features and build models that are both simple and accurate, showing excellent generalizability.

Identifiers

PMID40378351
PMCPMC12084048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.