ArticleBlood advances2025
Inequalities in CAR T-cell therapy access for US patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL: a SEER-Medicare data analysis.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- BCMA-directed mRNA CAR T cell therapy for myasthenia gravis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Equity in Neurotoxicity Care in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.Seminars in neurology · 2026Article
- Real-world treatment patterns of patients with large B-cell lymphoma over time and into a post-CAR T approval era.Blood advances · 2026Article
- A Prospective Population-Based Study of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- A Geographic Disparities Analysis Between Standard of Care and Clinical Trial CAR-T Patients in Kansas.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Bispecific Antibodies in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cells · 2026Review
- Current treatment algorithm: diffuse large B cell lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Targeting urological cancers with CAR-T cell therapy: current landscape and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- CRS or ICANS Are Rare Beyond 2 Weeks After Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Infusion: Data From Clinical Trials and the Real-World Setting.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Article
- CAR-T therapy: Trailblazing CAR(ing) in cancer treatment.Oncotarget · 2026Article
- Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9): The Multifaceted Biology, Diseases, and Pharmaceutical Interventions.MedComm · 2025Review
- CAR-T Access Disparities for Multiple Myeloma in the Midwest: A Social Determinants of Health Perspective.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Association of social vulnerability index and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy administration, 2018-2023.The oncologist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown curative potential for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other malignancies, but its accessibility among Medicare patients, particularly in disadvantaged populations, remains uncertain. This study aims to assess CAR-T use among Medicare patients with DLBCL receiving third-line or later (3L+) treatment, focusing on access disparities and their impact on clinical outcomes. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2007 to 2020, multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics and the effects of distance to authorized treatment centers (ATCs) on CAR-T access. Between 2017 and 2020, 2241 patients were treated for 3L+ DLBCL in the SEER-Medicare data, of whom 122 (5.4%) received CAR-Ts. CAR-T recipients were less likely to have multiple comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.904; P = .001) but more likely to live in higher income areas (OR, 1.176; P = .004). If distance to the nearest ATC for "poor-access" states (average distance to ATC, 104.4 miles) decreased to the average distance in "better-access" states (34.2 miles), there would be a 37.6% increase in number of patients receiving CAR-Ts (6.6%-9.1%; P < .001). These findings highlight substantial disparities in CAR-T use, driven by geographic and socioeconomic factors. Addressing these barriers could significantly enhance equitable access to CAR-T therapy and improve outcomes for underserved populations, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to reduce geographic and systemic barriers to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.