Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
A Low-Intensity Nutrition Intervention Targeting Triglycerides in Gestational Diabetes: A Feasibility RCT.
Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring CALD and Non-CALD Women's Behavioral and Dietary Responses to a Low-Intensity Intervention for Gestational Diabetes.Nutrients · 2025Trial
- Life-course management of gestational diabetes mellitus: A narrative review.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThe conventional approach to diet therapy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is carbohydrate modification to mitigate glucose-mediated fetal macrosomia. Maternal triglyceride concentrations more strongly relate to infant adiposity than maternal glucose.
objectiveThis work aimed to assess the feasibility of a low-intensity dietary intervention designed to attenuate the rise in triglycerides compared to standard GDM management.
methodsWomen with GDM were randomly assigned at approximately 30 weeks' gestation to a standard care group (ie, usual GDM management) or to an intervention group, at an allocation ratio of 1:1. The intervention group received standard care plus individual counseling on reducing intake of ultraprocessed foods, increasing fruits, vegetables, fish and nuts, and changes to healthier fats. The primary outcome is study feasibility; secondary and exploratory outcomes include maternal dietary intakes, plasma triglyceride and glucose levels, and birth weight.
resultsOver 10 months of active recruitment, 444 women were invited to participate. Of these, 59 were eligible (13.2%), 38 (8.6%) consented and were randomly assigned (n = 19 intervention, n = 19 standard care), and 34 women completed the study. The recruitment rate was 1 per week, the retention rate was 89.5%, and the feasibility of eligibility criteria was 70.4%. Nearly all women in the intervention group who responded to the questionnaire (n = 15/16) reduced their ultraprocessed food intake, and 11 women increased their intake of nuts. There was no end of study differences in nonfasting plasma triglycerides (mean [95% CI] in intervention, 2.84 [2.22-3.46] mmol/L vs standard care, 3.40 [2.78-4.02] mmol/L). Mean birthweight was higher in the standard care group vs intervention group (mean difference [95% CI], 479.5 [110.7-848.3] g).
conclusionThere was a modest recruitment rate and a high retention rate, indicating a diet aimed at attenuating triglycerides is feasible and highly acceptable in women with GDM. The positive improvements observed in maternal diet and desirable birth weight warrant further investigation in a larger, definitive, randomized controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.