Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40378275›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2025

Galyean Appreciation Club review: knowledge gaps in the nutrition of grazing beef cattle.

Joel S Caton, David L Lalman, Luis O Tedeschi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joel S CatonDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108USA.
David L LalmanDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1739-6238
Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843-2471USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeding the increasing world population is a grand challenge for animal agriculture. Ruminants in general, and beef cattle specifically, fill a unique role in addressing this challenge as they convert large quantities of forage-based feed resources, which are inedible by humans, into high-quality, nutrient food products for human consumption. In North American beef cattle production systems, grazed forage represents a large portion of whole-herd dietary intake. In fact, within the United States, approximately 57% of the feed energy required to produce 1 kg of beef carcass weight is derived from grazing systems, and another 19% of feed energy is provided by harvested forage sources. Nutritional management of grazing beef herds is a critical component of efficient and effective production systems. Understanding nutrient supply and demand fosters more precise approaches to strategic supplementation practices. Limited source data from grazing beef cattle constrain modeling approaches of nutrient supply and demand and consequently limit our ability to nutritionally manage grazing beef cattle. Reviewing the available data exposes numerous knowledge gaps in the nutrition of grazing beef cattle. Needs include more robust source data collection and data collection technologies in the specific areas of intake, macro and micronutrient supply and demand, and nutrient demands associated with environmental extremes and physical activity. Additionally, more accurate and precise mathematical models are needed in the area of intake, energy, protein, and micronutrient supply and demand. In addition, coupling investigations of grazing livestock nutrition with behavior, climate, land use, socioeconomic, and sustainability needs will foster a more holistic understanding of the importance of accurately assessing and managing grazing cattle nutrition. Extensive opportunities exist to improve grazing livestock nutrition and consequently enhance sustainable capture of grazed forage nutrients and improved beef cattle production from grazing lands; however, limited funding streams to support these research efforts limit progress.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietAnimal FeedAnimalsCattlebeef cattlegrazingmodelingnutrition

Identifiers

PMID40378275
PMCPMC12202152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.