ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2025
Disparities in tissue-based biomarker testing among US Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersonalized therapeutic approaches for localized prostate cancer have evolved significantly, with tissue-based biomarker tests supplementing traditional risk stratification tools. However, national testing patterns and geographic variability remain limited a decade after coverage implementation. We aimed to assess current nationwide utilization and urban-rural differences in tissue-based biomarker testing.
methodsUsing full Medicare claims data, we retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and tissue-based biomarker testing claims from 2019 to 2023. Patients' county of residence was categorized as metro, urban, or rural. Regional testing rates were further assessed across hospital referral regions. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the effect of residence on test receipt.
resultsOur final cohort included 749 202 patients, of whom 79.5% lived in metro, 11.4% in urban and 8.00% in rural counties. Overall, 86 908 (11.6%) patients underwent tissue-based biomarker tests. Hospital referral region-level testing rates ranged from 2.4% to 42.7%. Rural patients were 18% less likely to undergo testing compared to metro patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.91). Independently, the odds of undergoing testing were lower among Black (OR 0.82, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.88) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.80, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.88) compared to White patients.
conclusionThis study reveals high geographic variability in tissue-based biomarker testing for prostate cancer. Further, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive testing. Our findings highlight regional practice variation in the use of advanced, not routinely recommended tests and underscore the need to minimize disparities in diagnostic access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.