Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2025
Early outcomes with a flexible ECAP based closed loop using multiplexed spinal cord stimulation waveforms-single-arm study with in-clinic randomized crossover testing.
Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05177354 (Evaluation of Long-term Patient Experience With a Medtronic Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation System), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Long-term Patient Experience With a Medtronic Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation System
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-Clinic and At-Home Patient Experiences with Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: 12-Month Outcomes from the Closed-Loop Australia Randomized Crossover Trial.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Pain Medicine Specialist: Championing High-Quality Development for Neuromodulation Technology.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Closed-loop SCS and sensing: now and in the future.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Review
- History of SCS and patient-focused innovations: a manufacturer's perspective on the role of technology.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Review
- A case series of two patients using closed-loop spinal cord stimulation: demonstration of the impact of real-time adjustments.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Open and closed loop differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type II: protocol for a one year European multicenter cohort study (ENDLESS).Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems that deliver fixed amplitudes expose target tissue to varying electrical fields due to the changing lead-to-cord distance accompanying postural shifts and other body movements. Inconsistent stimulation results in periods of overstimulation or under-stimulation perceived by patients as discomfort or potentially inadequate pain relief. CL-SCS may be applied to provide a comfortable level of perception down to imperceptible stimulation, commonly preferred in higher frequency and multiplexed programming. Here we report outcomes from a study evaluating a closed-loop (CL) SCS system that uses spinal evoked compound action potentials to adjust stimulation.
methodsThis ongoing study combines the evaluation of pain-related outcomes (for ≤24 months) with in-clinic randomized, crossover testing of CL performance.
resultsSixty subjects have been implanted with the CL-SCS system, and 54 subjects have completed the 3-month visit. Sixty percent preferred below-perception waveforms for therapy during at-home use. The study successfully met its primary endpoint with 89.3% of subjects in the Primary Analysis Set (n = 28) reporting reduction in overstimulation with CL-SCS relative to OL-SCS at 1 month (P < .001; binomial exact test); at 3 months, 86% of subjects with low-back/leg pain (n = 51); and all 3 with upper limb pain reported ≥50% reduction in pain, relative to baseline.
conclusionsThe data presented here support the performance of a flexible CL-SCS system that can deliver a variety of waveforms, with amplitude programmed to patient comfort and automatically adjusted up to 50 times per second, to improve the consistency of therapy experience. REGISTRATION: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT05177354 https://clinicaltrials.gov/search? term=NCT05177354.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.