Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40378179›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of community and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections among UTI suspected geriatrics in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia.

Getachew Bitew Alebachew, Mulat Dagnew, Aklilu Ambachew, Belay Tessema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Rising antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infections in Türkiye: an urgent need for update on regional treatment strategies and for enhanced antimicrobial stewardship efforts.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Getachew Bitew AlebachewDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6079-0271
Mulat DagnewDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-8519
Aklilu AmbachewDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Belay TessemaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial urinary tract infection (UTI) is the second most frequent infection next to respiratory tract infection within the geriatric population both in the community and hospital settings. There is a limited data regarding geriatrics UTI in this study area. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the status of the community and hospital-acquired urinary tract infections, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among UTI suspected geriatrics which is essential to physicians and health care workers to implement appropriate intervention.

methodsA comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 460 UTI suspected geriatrics admitted at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and attended in Gondar town (Kallen Bnakafl and Menna Geriatrics Support Center Clinics) from 1st May 2022-14th July 2022. Socio-demographic data were collected using structured questionnaires. Urine culture was performed and isolates were counted for significant growth by a colony counter, and their antibiotic susceptibility was done by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Data were entered using Epi Data version 4.0.0 and analyzed by Stata/IC version 14.0. P-value < 0.05 at 95% CI was considered statistically significant.

resultThe overall prevalence of UTI in geriatrics was 44.4%. The prevalence of UTI among community and hospitalized suspected patients was 38.7% and 50%, respectively. Escherichia coli (E. coli) (38.6%) predominated across the two groups, followed by Klebsiella spp. (15.8%), S. saprophyticus (12.2%), P. mirabilis (9.1%), S. aureus (5.9%), and Citrobacter spp. (2.8%). Pseudomonas spp. (7.1%), K. rhinoscleromatis (5.1%), and P. vulgaris (2.8%), were isolated from only hospitalized patients. Piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibly was 100% in both study groups. Nalidixic acid resistance was 50% to 87.5% and 50% to 100% in the isolates from community and hospitalized UTI suspects, respectively.

conclusionThis study found a high prevalence of bacterial UTI in geriatrics and a high rate of bacterial resistance was observed to most antimicrobial drugs tested. Piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were the most active antimicrobials for UTI. Therefore, expanding routine bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing and strengthening regular surveillance systems are essential for appropriate patient care.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionUrinary Tract InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEthiopiaFemaleGeriatricsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40378179
PMCPMC12083834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.