ArticlePloS one2025
Removing barriers to COVID-19 vaccine intention in a university population: Results of a serial mediation study through the dimensions of the Health Belief Model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile many studies have used the Health Belief Model (HBM) to understand vaccine intention, none claim to have used serial mediation to understand the relationship between HBM dimensions and COVID-19 vaccine intention. This study developed a serial mediation model to assess the direct and indirect effects of the latent HBM dimensions on COVID-19 primary vaccine intention.
methodsA cross-sectional study: from 01 April to 10 June 2021, a self-administered online questionnaire on vaccine intention against COVID-19 was distributed to staff and students at the University of Liège (Belgium). Direct and indirect effects of the HBM dimensions (perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, self-efficacy and cues to action) on vaccine intention (score 0-100) were assessed with serial mediation models. Actually, each permutation of the latent HBM dimensions, i.e., each causal chain, was assessed using partial least squares path modelling (PLS-PM) according to the order of the HBM dimensions in that particular chain.
resultsThe sample was made up of 1256 participants. The final model revealed that the causal chain with the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) value was barriers (Effect estimation (CI95%): -0.09 (-0.15 - -0.03)) ↘ severity (-0.13 (-0.20 - -0.07)) ↘ low self-efficacy (0.20 (0.15-0.25)) ↘ low susceptibility (-0.55 (-0.60 - -0.51)) ↘ vaccine intention (outcome). This revealed a significant indirect and direct effect (-0.20 (-0.25 - -0.15)) between barriers and vaccine intention.
conclusionsThe results demonstrated that perceived barriers are a key determinant in COVID-19 primary vaccine intention. Public health practitioners need to prioritise messaging that addresses the barriers reducing vaccine intention to enable individuals to make an informed choice. These messages could form part of a mass communication campaign aimed at hesitant individuals, with evidence-based information about vaccine safety a priority in order to establish a climate of trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.