ArticlePloS one2025
Autonomous adaptive optimization of NMR experimental conditions for precise inference of minor conformational states of proteins based on chemical exchange saturation transfer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In scientific experiments where measurement sensitivity is a major limiting factor, the optimization of experimental conditions, such as measurement parameters, is essential to maximize the information obtained per unit time and the number of experiments performed. When optimization in advance is not possible because of limited prior knowledge of the system, autonomous, adaptive optimization must be implemented during the experiment. One approach to this involves sequential Bayesian optimal experimental design, which adopts mutual information as the utility function to be maximized. In this study, we applied this optimization method to the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiment in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, which is used to study minor but functionally important invisible states of certain molecules, such as proteins. Adaptive optimization was utilized because prior knowledge of minor states is limited. To this end, we developed an adaptive optimization system of 15N-CEST experimental conditions for proteins using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to calculate the posterior distribution and utility function. To ensure the completion of MCMC computations within a reasonable period with sufficient precision, we developed a second-order approximation of the CEST forward model. Both simulations and actual measurements using the FF domain of the HYPA/FBP11 protein with the A39G mutation demonstrated that the adaptive method outperformed the conventional one in terms of estimation precision of minor-state parameters based on equal numbers of measurements. Because the algorithm used for the evaluation of the utility function is independent of the type of experiment, the proposed method can be applied to various spectroscopic measurements in addition to NMR, if the forward model or its approximation can be calculated sufficiently quickly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.