ArticlePloS one2025
Outpatient care changes and associated mortality among Veterans with heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare System Resilience and Adaptation: A 6-Year Analysis of Heart Failure Care in the Veterans Affairs System.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Healthcare System Resilience and Adaptation: A Six-Year Analysis of Heart Failure Care in the Veterans Affairs System.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe mortality risk associated with loss of in-person outpatient visits or transition to virtual care in patients with heart failure (HF) during the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown.
objectivesAssess changes in outpatient HF care patterns and associated mortality.
methodsRetrospective analysis of HF patients using national Veterans-Health-Administration (VHA) data. Among 509,511 HF patients who received VHA care, we compared mean monthly days-with-an-outpatient-visit from 2/2018-1/2020 (pre-COVID) versus 2/2020-1/2021 (COVID) using T-tests. In a subset of 321,439 patients with ≥1 VHA cardiology or primary-care visit in 2019, we related the presence and type of outpatient visit with mortality using Cox-Regression estimated hazard-ratios (HRs).
resultsDespite a 2-3-fold increase in video-only visits and use of telephone visits to maintain access, the overall days with outpatient visits decreased from a monthly-average of 81.4 ± 6.1 in 2018-2019 and 81.0 ± 5.6 in 2019-2020, to 57.8 ± 11 days in 2020-2021 (P < 0.01 for both), per 100 Veterans. When compared to patients with no-visits during the study period, the adjusted-mortality risk was lowest for patients with at least one in-person (HR 0.42, 95%CI: 0.41-0.44), followed by video-only (HR 0.52, 95%CI: 0.50-0.55) and then telephone-only (HR 0.57, 95%CI: 0.54-0.60) visits (p = 0.14 for trend). Results remained similar when the analysis was repeated (without including telephone visits) for pre-COVID (2/2018-1/2020) periods.
conclusionsDespite an increase in video and use of telephone visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was still a decrease in total outpatient visits for patients with HF. The presence and type of outpatient encounter was associated with the adjusted risk of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.