ArticlePloS one2025
Comparison of perceived family state and functioning among individuals with depression and general population in Southern Thailand.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative clinical and molecular insights into the comorbidity between depression and sleep apnea syndrome.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to examine perceived family functioning among individuals with depression, then compare these perceptions with those of the general population. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals with depression at Songklanagarind Hospital and individuals from the general population; from May to July 2024. Participants completed three questionnaires: 1) Personal and demographic inquiry, 2) the Family State and Functioning Assessment Scale (FSFAS-25), and 3) the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student's t-test.
resultsThe study compared 41 individuals with depression with 41 from the general population; revealing significant differences in family functioning scores. The depression group reported lower median family functioning scores (76 [IQR 64-84]) compared with the general population (87 [IQR 77-93]). Fewer individuals in the depression group reported high total family functioning scores (56.1% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.016). They also showed lower percentages in family support (61.0% vs. 95.1%, p < 0.001) and discipline dimensions (46.3% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.006). Furthermore, those with residual depression symptoms (PHQ-9 having a score of nine or higher) showed significant differences in family support (37.5% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.033) and emotional status (18.8% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.023) compared with those without residual depression symptoms.
conclusionIndividuals with depression demonstrated lower levels of family functioning compared with the general population. Acknowledging and addressing the influence of family dynamics on the development and persistence of the disorder may be essential for improving treatment outcomes. Integrating these factors into person-centered mental health interventions can lead to more comprehensive, individualized, and effective care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.