ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of access to a well-resourced environment on dairy calf cognition and affective state.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moving hens into cages affects cognitive performance, extinction learning and motivation for rewards.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026Article
- Effect of dairy calf rearing systems on affective states.Discover animals · 2026Review
- Cognition of dairy cattle: Implications for animal welfare and dairy science.JDS communications · 2025Review
- Exploring dairy heifers' consistency in social motivation in the absence or presence of conspecifics.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dairy calves are often raised without maternal contact and in environments of low complexity. Environments that limit natural behaviors are known to impair cognitive development and affective states. We explored the effect of environmental complexity on one measure of social cognition (the ability to discriminate between conspecifics) and one measure of affective states (sensitivity to reward). Pairs of calves were randomly allocated to either 1) pair housing for 22.5 h/d with 1.5 h of daily access to a well-resourced pen which included 3 other calves and physical devices (Enriched; n = 6 pairs) or, 2) pair housing for 24 h/d (Control; n = 6 pairs). Calves were trained to discriminate between 2 calves in a Y-maze. Twelve of the 24 calves tested met the learning criterion, requiring 15.7 ± 2.59 (mean ± SD) training sessions. Treatment did not affect the number of sessions needed to reach the learning criterion. Calves were then subjected to a Successive Negative Contrast test during which they were trained to approach a 0.5 L milk reward over 3 trials/day for 3 days. On the last training day, latencies of enriched calves increased over daily trials while latencies for control calves were lower and remained relatively consistent, indicative of greater sensitivity to reward. Starting on day 4, the reward was reduced to 0.1L of milk/trial and remained at this level for the next 5 test days. Latency to reach the reward increased across trials within each test day, but no effect of treatment or test day was found. Our findings suggest that calves can discriminate among individuals but learning was not affected by treatments. Calves raised in standard pair housing showed increased sensitivity to reward, consistent with experiencing a more negative emotional state in comparison to calves reared with access to a well-resourced environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.