Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40378102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A robust optimization model for allocation-routing problems under uncertain conditions.

Tingting Zhang, Yanqiu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tingting ZhangSchool of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4338-9381
Yanqiu LiuSchool of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-earthquake emergency logistics faces significant challenges such as limited resources, uncertain casualty numbers, and time constraints. Developing a scientific and efficient rescue plan is crucial. One of the key issues is integrating facility location and casualty allocation in emergency medical services, an area rarely explored in existing research. This study proposes a robust optimization model to optimize the location of medical facilities and the transfer of casualties within a three-level rescue chain consisting of disaster areas, temporary hospitals, and general hospitals. The model accounts for limited medical resources, casualty classification, and uncertainty in casualty numbers. The Trauma Index Score (TIS) method is used to classify casualties into two groups, and the dynamic changes in their injuries after treatment at temporary hospitals are considered. The objective is to minimize the total TIS of all casualties. A robust optimization approach is applied to derive the corresponding robust model, and its validity is verified through case studies based on the Lushan earthquake. The findings show that data variability and the uncertainty budget play a critical role in determining hospital locations and casualty transportation plans. Temporary hospital capacity significantly influences the objective function more than general hospitals. As the problem size increases, the robust optimization model performs better than the deterministic model. Furthermore, uncertainty in casualty numbers has a more significant impact on serious casualties than moderate casualties. To enhance the model's applicability, it is extended into a two-stage dynamic location-allocation model to better address the complexity of post-disaster scenarios.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningEmergency Medical ServicesModels, TheoreticalResource AllocationAlgorithmsEarthquakesHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40378102
PMCPMC12083844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.