ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Clinicogenomic Characterization of Inflammatory Breast Cancer.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival and Treatment Patterns in Stage III Inflammatory and Noninflammatory Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Molecular and socioeconomic characteristics of inflammatory breast cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Inflammatory breast cancer, best practice in the community setting.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and clinically distinct form of breast cancer associated with poor outcomes. The biological mechanisms driving IBC remain poorly understood, partly due to limited large-scale genomic studies that directly compare IBC with non-IBC cases. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 140 patients with IBC (68 primary tumors and 72 metastatic tumors) and 2,317 patients with non-IBC (700 primary tumors, 65 local recurrences, and 1,552 metastases). We compared clinicopathologic features, single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variants, tumor mutational burden, and exploratory survival outcomes between IBC and non-IBC tumors.
resultsThe most frequent somatic alterations in IBC were detected in TP53 (72%), ERBB2 (32%), PIK3CA (24%), CCND1 (12%), MYC (9%), FGFR1 (8%), and GATA3 (8%). Multivariate logistic regression revealed a significant enrichment of TP53 single-nucleotide variants in IBC, particularly in HER2+ and hormone receptor-positive disease. Tumor mutational burden did not differ between IBC and non-IBC cases. In HER2+ disease, a pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of NOTCH pathway alterations. TP53, CCND1, and RB1 alterations were associated with poor outcomes in IBC.
conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive resource of somatic alterations in a large cohort of patients with metastatic IBC and non-IBC, highlighting genomic features associated with worse outcomes. Our findings reveal a significant enrichment of TP53 mutations, reinforcing its critical role in IBC pathogenesis. Few other distinct differences in IBC were observed, suggesting further investigations-beyond bulk sequencing of the somatic genome-are required to better understand the biology driving this aggressive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.