ArticleJAMA health forum2025
Global Adoption of Value-Based Health Care Initiatives Within Health Systems: A Scoping Review.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The quintuple aim as a framework for health system performance: a systematic review of empirical applications.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Early discharge after clinical stabilization in acute decompensated heart failure: associations with short-term outcomes.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Worldwide Innovative Network Consortium: Building a Common Global Cancer Database.JCO global oncology · 2026Review
- National scale up of PROM based monitoring after joint replacement in Germany.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Conflicts of interest as a barrier to the development of health technology assessment in Iran: a qualitative study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Desirability and feasibility of value-based healthcare in the Dutch Military Health System: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Standardized clinical assessment and management plans revisited: lessons learned from a decade of implementation.Health affairs scholar · 2026Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of aortic aneurysm and its risk factors, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Three Shifts That Will Redefine Health Systems.Health care science · 2026Article
- Exploration and practice of data-driven high-quality development in smart hospitals.AIMS public health · 2026Article
- Less is more: inverting the paradigm across the cancer care continuum.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- The Value of Medical Toxicologists.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025Article
- Toward value in healthcare: opportunities and challenges for implementing Value-Based Healthcare in North Macedonia.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Risk-sharing agreements for medical devices: a stakeholder-based qualitative study in Czechia.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Health systems worldwide are facing several contextual challenges threatening their sustainability, including aging populations with complex health care needs, workforce shortages, and persistent health disparities, which are driving health care costs. Optimizing health systems to respond to contextual challenges and offer quality care for all requires innovative frameworks like value-based health care (VBHC) and high-value health systems (HVHS) frameworks that focus on improving patient outcomes while minimizing costs. Objective: To examine how value-based initiatives have been introduced in health systems worldwide. Evidence Review: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Health Business Elite, and Web of Science Core Collection. The search included controlled vocabulary terms relevant to VBHC and covered publications between January 1, 2007, and July 7, 2023. After title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review, experimental, observational, and case studies that examined the implementation of the VBHC framework or its elements were included. Articles that focused solely on insurance, cost-effectiveness analysis, theoretical models without implementation, nonempirical studies (eg, reviews, commentaries), and gray literature (eg, news articles) were excluded. Findings: Of 11 948 articles initially identified for potential inclusion, the final sample included 50 initiatives, with 47 from high-income countries, 2 from upper-middle-income countries, and 1 from a lower-middle-income country. The review revealed that VBHC adoption remains confined to the departmental or institutional level, with few examples of systemwide or national implementation. Although many initiatives integrated various elements of the VBHC framework and components of the HVHS model, none achieved full implementation of all aspects. Conclusions and Relevance: This scoping review showed that since its formal introduction in 2006, VBHC has been widely recognized as a strategy for improving health system performance, but large-scale adoption will require a strategic shift toward integrating value-based components at national and regional levels. These findings highlight the need for research on effective implementation models, particularly in lower-resource settings, to guide policymakers and health system leaders in scaling VBHC and transitioning toward HVHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.