ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Improved drowsiness detection in drivers through optimum pairing of EEG features using an optimal EEG channel comparable to a multichannel EEG system.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderate-to-Severe OSA and Objective Drowsiness Are Associated with Driving-Related Accidents, but Not Subjective Sleepiness: A Simulator Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Smart assistive technologies for neurodisorders: A review on AI, IoT, and wearable systems for enhanced patient care.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- A Novel Hybrid Approach for Drowsiness Detection Using EEG Scalograms to Overcome Inter-Subject Variability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multichannel electroencephalography (EEG)-based drowsiness detection (DD) offers higher coverage but comes with increased computational demands, hardware requirements, and user discomfort, whereas single-channel devices are cost-effective and user-friendly but provide lower coverage. We hypothesized that an optimal channel with optimum paired EEG features could achieve coverage comparable to a multichannel system. Subject-specific, EEG-feature-specific thresholding techniques were introduced to classify 927 EEG epochs, derived from visual-based scoring through image processing of fifty drivers' facial expressions during a 50-min driving simulation, using six individual EEG channels with paired features. Ten normalized EEG features were extracted per epoch using discrete wavelet transform (DWT), and seven thresholding techniques were applied to identify the most consistent method across subjects. Epochs were classified as drowsy or wakeful based on whether their normalized values exceeded or fell below a specific threshold. We then assessed the coverage of each channel by comparing EEG patterns with visual-based scoring. To determine the optimal feature pair for classifying each epoch in alignment with visual-based scoring, 45 feature combinations were evaluated. The pairing of power spectral density (PSD) alpha and PSD theta in channels Frontal4 (F4) and Occipital2 (O2) yielded the highest coverage, achieving 96.1% and 95% with corresponding accuracies of 95.4% and 94.7%, respectively. These results slightly surpassed the coverage achieved using six channels with a single feature, with increases of 1.47% for F4 and 0.32% for O2. Our study demonstrates that an optimal EEG channel with optimum paired EEG features can reduce channels from six to one, lowering computational demands for wearable DD devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.