Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40377857›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025

Influence of Rheumatoid Factors on the Efficacy of TNF Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Atsushi Nagayasu, Yusuke Miyazaki, Koshiro Sonomoto, Satoshi Kubo, Ippei Miyagawa, Ayako Yamaguchi, Hiroaki Tanaka, Yasuyuki Todoroki, Masanobu Ueno, Takafumi Aritomi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Ozoralizumab, a trivalent anti-TNFα NANOBODYFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Atsushi NagayasuThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Yusuke MiyazakiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Koshiro SonomotoThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Satoshi KuboThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Ippei MiyagawaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Ayako YamaguchiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Hiroaki TanakaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Yasuyuki TodorokiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Masanobu UenoThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Takafumi AritomiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Yuya FujitaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Hidenori SakaiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Katsunori SuzukiDepartment of Infectious Disease Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shingo NakayamadaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Yoshiya TanakaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan. tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-7139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) is reduced in patients with rheumatoid factor (RF)-high rheumatoid arthritis (RA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), lacking the Fc portion, may not be affected. This study aimed to compare CZP with Fc-containing TNFi and investigate whether RF levels affect the efficacy of CZP in patients with RA.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study involved patients with RA (n = 1010) who received TNFi with concomitant methotrexate (MTX). Patients were categorized by baseline RF quartiles. The primary endpoint was the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission rates at 26 weeks for patients treated with CZP and those receiving Fc-containing TNFi. The secondary endpoint compared the efficacy of CZP and adalimumab (ADA) in each RF quartile using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW).

resultsIn the overall cohort, the SDAI remission rate was the lowest in Q4 (RF ≥ 136.45 IU/mL). In Q4, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that only the introduction of CZP was significantly associated with remission at 26 weeks. The Fc-containing TNFi group had significantly lower SDAI remission rates in Q4 compared with Q1-Q3. Conversely, the SDAI remission rates were similar between the two groups treated with CZP. After PS-IPTW adjustment in Q4, CZP-treated patients showed a significantly lower SDAI and higher remission rate (36.6%) compared with the ADA-treated patients (24.5%) (p = 0.0172). No significant differences in SDAI remission rates were observed between the two groups in Q1-Q3.

conclusionCZP may be more effective than Fc‑containing TNFi in patients with RA and high RF levels.

Indexed as

Certolizumab pegolRheumatoid arthritisRheumatoid factorTumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID40377857
PMCPMC12246341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.