Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Impact of loving-kindness meditation intervention vs. music intervention during biopsy on adherence to recommended breast cancer screening.
Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of providing a loving-kindness meditation (LKM) intervention vs. a music intervention during core-needle breast biopsy (CNBB) on adherence to subsequent, clinically recommended breast cancer screening and surveillance.
methodsWomen (N = 120) were randomly assigned to receive LKM, Music, or Usual Care during CNBB. Patients in the LKM or Music groups listened to audio recordings during CNBB and were provided recordings for home use. Utilization of subsequent recommended breast imaging was assessed via health record review for 18 months into the breast cancer surveillance period.
resultsThe sample was, on average, 53 years old (SD = 12.4), partnered (55%), and employed (56%); 28% Black and 68% White. Adherence to recommended breast imaging post-biopsy was: 69% for Usual Care, 71% for Music, and 90% for LKM. Compared to Usual Care, there was no significant difference in adherence for the Music group (OR = 1.11, 95% CI [0.43, 2.89], p = 0.829), but the LKM group was 3.9 times more likely to be adherent (OR = 3.89, 95% CI [1.13, 13.41], p = 0.032). Comparisons between intervention arms showed adherence for the LKM group was 3.5 times higher than the Music group (OR = 3.50, 95% CI [1.02, 12.00], p = 0.046). Patterns of adherence were similar across women with an abnormal biopsy result and those with a benign result.
conclusionA LKM intervention initiated during CNBB can have significant, positive impacts on women's adherence to subsequent recommended breast imaging. Providing patients with LKM during CNBB is an easily disseminated approach that could improve adherence to breast cancer screening and surveillance after CNBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40377811What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.