ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Intravenous immunoglobulin for the acute treatment of refractory optic neuritis in Japan.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of risk factors for relapse at initial onset in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis using ophthalmic findings.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the usage status and evaluate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for the acute treatment of optic neuritis (ON) in Japan. STUDY
designMulticenter retrospective case series.
methodsThe study subjects were patients with steroid-resistant acute ON in whom IVIG had been initiated between January 2020 and August 2022 at 30 facilities in Japan. The clinical characteristics, visual acuity, and adverse events following IVIG were compared among anti-aquaporin 4 antibody positive ON (AQP4-ON), anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody positive ON (MOG-ON), and idiopathic ON (ION).
resultsThe study included sixty-five patients (76 eyes); the main clinical department administering IVIG was ophthalmology (50 cases, 77.0 %). 43 cases had their first ON attack and 22 cases had recurrent ON. Plasmapheresis (PP) was combined in 21 cases. The efficacy endpoint, changes in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) after IVIG compared with preIVIG, showed statistically significant improvement in the AQP4-ON group at one week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after IVIG (p=0.015, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). In the MOG-ON group, excluding cases with combined PP, logMAR post IVIG did not improve significantly compared with preIVIG. Among the ION group, compared with preIVIG, logMAR at 4weeks and 12 weeks post IVIG were statistically significant improved (p=0.019, p=0.023, respectively). Adverse events occurred in 7 patients with IVIG. 4 of the 7 patients continued the IVIG treatment, and 3 patients discontinued it within 5 days.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that IVIG may be an effective new option for acute treatment of steroid-resistant ON as an add-on to conventional therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.